Setting Your Group Up for Success
The success of a group is often determined by the structure and expectations established at the outset. These are typically worked out in the initial communications and during the first group meeting. During this startup phase, you’re seeking a plan for working together that accounts for everyone’s time and goals and ensures even participation from each member of the group. You may also want to set a future date to revisit your meeting plan to ensure it is meeting each member’s needs.
Initial Communications
When approaching prospective members, offer some proposals about group format, focus, and logistics—with flexibility to revise these in response to members’ goals. The GWL’s Peer-Review Group Startup Emails provide a template for details to include. And the sections on logistics and format below offer options for structuring your group that address a range of needs.
Each member’s commitment to a shared set of logistics and norms is essential for a sustainable group. Establishing how you will work together should be the central focus on the first meeting. During that meeting, have each member share their goals for the group and use those to generate a set of practices that meets everyone’s needs. The First Meeting Logistics for the GWL’s STEM Fellowship Groups offers a model for how to conduct your first meeting. And the sections below give you a list of topics to discuss.
General Logistics
For the sake of efficiency you’ll want to establish shared expectations for meeting locations, modes of communication, and leadership structure. Questions you might consider include:
- Where & when group will the group meet? (in-person location, Zoom, hybrid)
- Does the group have an end date, or is it indefinite?
- How many members will the group have? (4–6 is usually ideal)
- How will group members communicate? (email, group text, Slack, etc.)
- What is the leadership structure? Will one member send reminders, reserve rooms, facilitate discussion, etc.? Or will these tasks be distributed, rotate weekly, etc.?
Exchanging Drafts
To facilitate the exchange of feedback, group members will need to consider what kind(s) of work will be shared and how group members will share it. Questions to consider include:
- Will group members share just one kind of work—dissertation chapters, fellowship applications, job search materials—or any work in progress they’d like feedback on?
- What is the word or page limit on drafts?
- In what format will drafts be shared? (MS Word, Google docs, etc.)
- How far in advance of the meeting will drafts be shared? (At least 48 hours is advisable.)
- Will presenters highlight elements they’d like feedback on when sending drafts? (This is recommended.)
- What is the medium of feedback? (written, verbal, or both? Sentence-level editing or more general comments? Written feedback sent before, during, or after meetings?)
- How much time will each participant spend reading and preparing comments on each draft? (Essential for helping each member feel they’re contributing equally to the group.)
Meeting Format
The format of meetings should align with group members’ goals. GWL dissertation groups typically begin with a 10-minute check-in, followed by two participants receiving draft feedback for 30-minutes each, and conclude with 10 minutes of goal setting and goal sharing. But many groups adjust this structure to meet the needs of participants. Here are some common elements of peer-review groups you might consider building into yours:
- Exchanging feedback on drafts
- Goal-setting/sharing; progress updates
- Co-writing
- Talking about writing process / progress towards writing goals
- Strategizing or sharing writing resources
- Discussing model texts or expectations of the genre
- Writing a collaborative project
- Lightning round of feedback on very short drafts from each group member
While you won’t be able to include all of these elements in your group, meetings will flow more smoothly if you build a few into your ongoing structure. Once your meeting structure is established, you can occasionally shift the formats of individual meetings for a change of pace (e.g. doing a lightning round of feedback every month or two). If plans change last minute, you can always shift to co-writing.