students working together

Grading at Yale

A guide to grading policies and practices at Yale College

Yale Grading

Overview

The Yale College Handbook for Instructors of Undergraduates provides comprehensive information about grading policies at Yale. Yale University is not immune from grade inflation, but we note that faculty committees and departments periodically review grading practices. Grading practices vary across departments and disciplines. We recommend that instructors consult with department colleagues and the Director of Undergraduate Studies (DUS)  or the Director of Graduate Studies (DGS) to learn about local norms.

Instructors with a primary appointment outside of Yale College should consult with their graduate or professional school’s guidelines to learn more about specific grading policies and practices.

Basic Grading Practices

The Handbook for Instructors of Undergraduates in Yale College institutionalizes three basic grading practices that all instructors of Yale undergraduates should adhere to.

Letter Grades

The Handbook states the following: “Instructors submit letter grades to the registrar for all students in their courses. For a Yale College student who has elected the Credit/D/Fail option, the registrar converts grades of A, A–, B+, B, B–, C+, C, and C– to CR and enters that mark on the student’s record. Grades of D+, D, D–, and F are recorded as reported.” A corresponds to excellent, B corresponds to good, C corresponds to satisfactory, D corresponds to passing, and F corresponds to failing.

At Yale, instructors cannot award an A+. Instead, exemplary work may be noted with an End-of-Term Report where an instructor explains the student’s exceptional performance. These reports are sent to the student’s residential college dean who may reference the report when they write a letter of recommendation for the student or otherwise recommend the student for a Yale prize or fellowship. 

If an instructor fails a student, they must submit an End-of-Term Report explaining the situation.

Midterm Feedback

The Handbook states the following: “The Yale College Course of Study Committee requires instructors to provide students with some sort of feedback on their academic progress by around the middle of the term. The purpose of this policy is to allow students to have some measure of their standing in a course and of their mastery of its materials, so that if they are doing badly they can take prompt remedial action.”

“There are no midterm grades as such, although midterm is considered a time for the instructor to give students an informal assessment of their work as well as to alert the residential college deans of those students having difficulty in a course.”

The “Instructor’s Midterm Report, a form used for reporting information about students doing unsatisfactory work, particularly those who are in danger of failing a course, … should be filled out for each student the instructor considers to be at a D or an F level.”

Graded Assignments

The Handbook states the following: “In addition to a final examination or a paper due at the end of the term, instructors should plan some other graded assignments during the term, such as a midterm test, an oral report, or a short paper.” 

Grading Policies and Approaches

Instructors may choose whether they would like to assess students using letter grades or numerical grades. Many classes that assign papers or essay exams to assess students, particularly humanities and social science seminars, will exclusively use letters for grading.

Yale’s official letter grades do not correspond with a specific range of numerical grades. Thus, if an instructor elects to use numerical grades for individual assignments, they should create a number-to-letter-grade conversion system and make sure their students understand how their final grades will be calculated. This grading practice is the norm for STEM courses and frequently used for humanities and social science exams.

Canvas has a default numerical to letter grade conversion, but faculty can adjust the conversion to fit their departmental or school norms and policies.

Some classes allow students to rework term assignments in order to help students attain mastery regardless of their initial skill/knowledge level. The instructor gives students one or more opportunities to respond to instructor feedback, re-work their product, and re-submit an assignment. Some instructors allow for students to rework and resubmit until an assignment reaches the quality and grade a student desires.

Some instructors may choose to assign grades along a certain distribution. Sometimes the curves are structured to benefit students’ grades, such as adding free points to an exam until a certain number of students achieve scores of 100. 

Other curves seek to deflate grades by adding limits and quotas for the share of students that can receive each letter grade. However, it is important for instructors to note that when the Ad Hoc Committee on Grading in 2013 proposed recommending grade distributions to deflate grades, this particular proposal was met with significant student opposition including organized protests. The faculty ultimately voted against adopting this proposal. A quota system can lead to unfair and inaccurate reflections of student work. For instance, if 40% of students earn an A on an exam based on the rubric, but the quota is set such that only 30% of student should receive an A, a deflationary curve will not accurately reflect student performance.

There is no University-wide policy on late submissions, except those governed by the Academic Regulations concerning late or postponed work (i.e., “dean’s extensions”, which permit late work under five conditions: severe illness, death of a family member, comparable emergency, observance of religious holidays, and participation in varsity intercollegiate athletic events). Some departments have strict policies, such as lowering the assignment’s grade by half a letter for every twenty-four hours an assignment is late. Consult with your department or school to learn if they have specific guidelines. 

In practice, enforcing late-grade deductions is up to the instructor’s discretion. Instructors of upper level seminars in the humanities and social sciences are often very flexible about deadlines. In these spheres, Yale culture tends to prioritize “better work” over rushed submissions. In addition, upper level seminars and lecture sections often practice a “midnight” deadline, implying any time before the next morning (e.g. papers submitted at 4:30 am are hardly ever penalized). Given Yale College’s cultural norms regarding deadlines, instructors who desire to implement very strict deadlines and penalties should make this explicitly clear in the syllabus.

Some instructors at Yale will mark a paper A-/B+ to let a student know that their paper or project was borderline between two grades. This kind of ambiguity can be especially confusing for underclassmen, and instructors who choose to use in-between grades should clearly communicate their pedagogical purpose.

Sometimes, special marks must be reported to the Registrar in place of the usual letter grades. The Registrar provides additional information about these marks along with the end-of-the-term packet.

  • Credit/D/Fail: This is essentially the “Pass/Fail” option for undergraduates who want to take a course without the pressure of letter grades impacting their GPA. It is common for students to select the Credit/D/Fail option. However, an instructor has no way of knowing if a student is taking the course as Credit/D/Fail and is not permitted to ask, though students may choose to volunteer that information. At the end of term, these students are assigned a letter grade just like any other student, and the registrar changes the letter grade to “Cr” (for grades A through C-) or keeps the given letter grade (for grades D through F). Students may use up to four Credit/D/Fail during their time at Yale and have an additional two for their first year that expire at the end of that academic year.
  • Withdrew (W): Students who decide that their performance in a given course is not desirable may choose to drop the course until 5PM on the last day of classes before reading period in that term. If dropped before midterm, that course will not appear on the transcript. If students drop a course after this date, the transcript will record a “W”, which stands for “withdrew”. Such a designation is not typically desirable. Instructors should offer high-quality feedback — either through grades or an in-person consultation — to students well before the midterm so they can decide whether or not to drop a class without the stress of incurring a “W.”
  • Other special marks are less common. They include SAT (satisfactory), TI (authorized temporary incomplete), and ABX (authorized absence from final examination). These are issued by deans of residential colleges.

There is no University-wide policy on attendance and no minimum number of classes that students are required to attend; instead, students are expected to show up regularly.  Lectures typically do not take attendance, and in many if not most courses, attendance has no direct impact on grades. 

If an instructor desires to implement an attendance policy, they should establish clear guidelines on their syllabus for how a missed class or section will affect student grades. A common policy for seminars that meet twice a week allows three absences before decreasing student letter grades by one half (on their class participation, final project, or even overall letter grade) for each additional absence unless the student has a Dean’s Extension (which varies across residential colleges). However, Yale instructors generally accommodate students with reasonable excuses with or without the Dean’s form.

Note

Clarity and fairness are the most important aspects of any course’s grading policy from both a pedagogical perspective and Yale culture. Instructors can consider effective syllabus design and assessment strategies in order to provide clear standards to students.